Li Xiaohong believed that tech companies would be the leaders in vertical industries. The early development of the giants in vertical industries benefited from the non-technological factors like innovative business models, unique resources and financial investment. The giants then had to eventually rely on technology to expand scale, increase efficiency and build up strength when the time comes.
READ
China has grown into the world’s second largest economy over the past 40 years. In this period, many Chinese technology companies represented by Huawei and Alibaba have become world-class corporations, which provide robust support for economic transformation and upgrading. At present, China is equipped with three conditions for extensive tech innovation: market, capital and talents. Huge opportunities for technological innovation are emerging in China.
READ
“Our investment is concentrated on certain fields. Our strategy covers VC and PE growth, and we would like to integrate some companies in certain fields through LBO in the future.”
READ
On the recent 17th China Venture Capital & Private Equity Annual Forum, CoStone Capital Zhang Wei said that investors on the primary market need to learn from Huawei for its way of consistent investing in R&D over the highs and lows of company’s development, and years of commitment that makes it stand out in its field. In Zhang Wei’s opinion, to succeed in investment is to do what Huawei does: unwavering commitment in key focus areas.
READChina’s economy is transitioning from rapid growth to a stage of high-quality development. In this period, VC firms are becoming an important link in supporting the innovative development of the real economy. They finance their portfolios and assist in their innovative practices, providing constant stream of resources in all aspects of their entrepreneurship.
READ
Zhang Wei, CEO of CoStone, and Wu Xinghua, president of Phλrmplus share one thought. Zhang and his team have a deep understanding of franchised pharmacies and highly value professional management teams and founders. Wu expects an understanding of his ideas from a potential institutional investor. So, when the two meet each other, the M&A happens.
READ
We believe in the power of compound interest which makes small victories a greater one. We never predict the macro-economy, never adapt founders and their teams, never recreate business models. Our portfolio companies are not industrial giants, for that we do not favor the so-called tailwind or the public lover. The past two years saw 12 billion RMB investment from CoStone, among which 7 billion went to TMT.
READ
On July 6, "China Private Equity Industry Hundred Talent Forum-Phase II" - "Venture Capital and Early Stage Investment Hundred Talent Forum" was held in Shenzhen.
READ
If SOE’s C-level executives still hold no shares, the mechanism will not change. I am not interested in companies of this kind.
READ
2016 sees ups and downs. Black swan events wait for deeper thoughts. In terms of mergers, two things in 2016 should be highlighted.
READOver the past year, the bull market returned, with technology leading the way.
As I said back in October 2024, the rally that began on September 24 was not merely a rebound, but a reversal. Since then, China's capital markets have undergone a broad revaluation, moving from undervaluation toward fair value.
The Shanghai Composite Index reached its highest level in a decade. The "Yi-Zhong-Tian" trio—Eoptolink, Zhongji Innolight and TFC Communication, three prominent Chinese optical communications stocks—saw their share prices multiply severalfold in a single year. Cambricon's market capitalization briefly exceeded RMB 600 billion. Elsewhere in the technology sector, triple-digit price-to-earnings ratios and valuations exceeding RMB 10 billion became commonplace.
Some investors were greedy; others, fearful. Still others asked me: Are technology stocks in a valuation bubble?
My answer is that what we are witnessing is the hunger and anxiety of an era, reflected in the capital markets. Once you understand this, the current fervor for technology investing is no longer difficult to explain.
Investment has nothing to do with macroeconomics, but everything to do with geopolitics.
China-US relations will shape the investment landscape for decades to come. Geopolitics has played a major role in shaping the hunger and anxiety of our times, fundamentally reshaping the way we invest.
What, then, lies at the heart of China's hunger and anxiety?
The Fourth Industrial Revolution is already underway, yet China has not fully overcome the technological shortcomings left by the Third. There is no time to lose.
This is why some people wonder: Why do Chinese computing chip companies command such high valuations when their technologies still lag so far behind NVIDIA's? Why does NVIDIA trade at just 50 times earnings, while a company hailed as "China's answer to NVIDIA" commands a multiple of 300?
To me, this gets the logic exactly backward.
It is precisely because these companies cannot catch up with NVIDIA in the near term that they command a higher strategic premium. The wider the technological gap, the greater the strategic value.
The further something lies beyond our reach, the stronger our hunger. The harder it is to catch up, the deeper our anxiety. If China were to achieve a complete breakthrough in computing chips one day, valuations might actually come down.
Where can one find China's most spectacular natural landscapes?
Much of the answer, I believe, lies in and around the Hengduan Mountains: the Meili Snow Mountains, Jade Dragon Snow Mountain, Mount Gongga, Mount Siguniang, Jiuzhaigou, and many others. Vast differences in elevation and deep fault lines have given rise to landscapes of extraordinary grandeur.
Hard-tech investing follows a similar logic.
Technological gaps, discontinuities in capabilities, and missing links in industrial systems: a leap in difficulty brings a leap in valuation, and a successful breakthrough can, in turn, bring a leap in returns.
This logic extends well beyond computing chips. It is equally evident in memory semiconductors, commercial spaceflight, and other sectors where China still faces substantial technological gaps with other countries.
It was precisely this conviction that led CoStone Capital, starting in 2016, to decisively focus its investments on three areas: hard tech, emerging industries, and life sciences and healthcare. In this context, "hard tech" refers specifically to important industries in which China faces a technological gap with the United States.
Thanks to this forward-looking strategy, CoStone Capital established an early presence across the full value chains of key sectors, including semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and robotics.
Looking ahead, the frontiers of technological progress and industrial upgrading are boundless. Nor can the gaps in hard technology be closed overnight. The twin windows of opportunity presented by technological innovation and the development of homegrown alternatives to foreign technologies have only just begun to open.
The road ahead is long, but the future holds immense promise.
As an investment firm, CoStone Capital will continue to invest where the hunger and anxiety of each era run deepest, move forward with the tensions that shape our times, and extend our reach toward the most challenging—and most important—frontiers.
Spring 2026
